case law air 1964 ker 277 - An Overview
case law air 1964 ker 277 - An Overview
Blog Article
Justia – an extensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, in addition to case regulation at both the federal and state levels.
The main objectives of police would be to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and earlier mentioned all make certain law and order to protect citizen???s life and property. Read more
ten . Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair to the offender as well as the Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other courts However they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
This ruling has conditions, and since the petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying Test, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based around the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances of your case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 with the Constitution. Read more
This Court could interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside a fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding attained from the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. Should the summary or finding is for instance no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court might interfere with the conclusion or maybe the finding and mould the relief to really make it proper towards the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is definitely the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-take pleasure in the evidence or the nature of punishment. Over the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified via the decision on the Supreme Court inside the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
Civil Courts retain jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it necessitates legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be produced and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
Within the United States, persons are not needed to hire an attorney to represent them in possibly civil or criminal matters. Laypeople navigating the legal system on their personal can remember one particular rule of thumb when it concerns referring to case regulation or precedent in court documents: be as specific as possible, leading the court, not only for the case, but on the section and paragraph containing the pertinent information.
A lot of judgments have affirmed that the mere registration of a crime does not represent a "public interest" justification for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in placing the Petitioner's name within the ECL based within the criminal case are inconsistent with set up legal principles. For that reason, this petition must be allowed Read more
10. Without touching the merits on the case of the issue of yearly increases within the pensionary emoluments on the petitioner, in terms of policy decision of the provincial government, these kinds of once-a-year increase, if permissible during the case of employees of KMC, demands further assessment to get made by the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance on account of funding issues and deficiency of adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, necessitating the petitioner to go after other legal avenues. Read more
This Court may interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside a method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the summary or finding attained because of the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If your summary or finding is for instance no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court may perhaps interfere with the summary or perhaps the finding and mold the relief to really make it ideal to your facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-appreciate the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. Around the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified because of the decision with the Supreme Court inside the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
12 . Const. P. 245/2025 (S.B.) Qurban Ali S/o Qasim V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The law enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair to the offender and also the Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other courts but they have did not have any corrective effect on it.
The appellate court determined that the trial court experienced not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to lotus case in international law get gathered by the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials acting within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case law previously rendered on similar cases.
Criminal cases During the common regulation tradition, courts decide the law applicable into a case by interpreting statutes and implementing precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. In contrast to most civil legislation systems, common legislation systems Adhere to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their personal previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all reduced courts should make decisions regular with the previous decisions of higher courts.